#2 15.12.05 12:36
Re: А что у нас с БЕстом?
[seva@hostel seva]$ ping best
PING best.hostel.nstu.ru (217.71.142.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 217.71.142.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.511 ms
64 bytes from 217.71.142.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.326 ms
64 bytes from 217.71.142.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=1.006 ms
64 bytes from 217.71.142.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=1.031 ms
64 bytes from 217.71.142.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.993 ms
64 bytes from 217.71.142.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.998 ms
64 bytes from 217.71.142.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.998 ms
64 bytes from 217.71.142.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=1.007 ms
64 bytes from 217.71.142.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.994 ms
64 bytes from 217.71.142.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=1.005 ms
64 bytes from 217.71.142.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=1.010 ms
64 bytes from 217.71.142.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=1.007 ms
64 bytes from 217.71.142.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=1.007 ms
64 bytes from 217.71.142.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=0.514 ms
64 bytes from 217.71.142.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=0.981 ms
64 bytes from 217.71.142.1: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=1.008 ms
64 bytes from 217.71.142.1: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=1.009 ms
64 bytes from 217.71.142.1: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=0.992 ms
64 bytes from 217.71.142.1: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=0.994 ms
64 bytes from 217.71.142.1: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=0.990 ms
64 bytes from 217.71.142.1: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=1.013 ms
^C
--- best.hostel.nstu.ru ping statistics ---
21 packets transmitted, 21 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.326/0.924/1.031/0.196 ms
Offline
#4 15.12.05 12:47
Re: А что у нас с БЕстом?
короче, есть такая проблема щас. Я админа предупредил, сказал что разберется, но он щас на работе. То есть постарается до вечера решить.
Offline
#10 15.12.05 16:45
#11 15.12.05 20:29
#12 15.12.05 21:45
Re: А что у нас с БЕстом?
Katy, прости милая, просто я в шоке до сих пор %)
Offline

